What “concessions” does Washington require from Russia in Syria?

On the eve of the US president it was stated that without some concessions from Russia “Moscow will find it difficult to achieve peace in Syria.” Experts immediately began to wonder about what specific concessions could be discussed in the statement of Obama. Agency Rider claims that he became aware of the specific "concessions from the Russian Federation", which are expected in the United States. At the same time, the news agency refers to the letter of Michael Ratney (Washington’s special representative at the talks on Syria) to members of the so-called moderate opposition.

From the letter of Ratni:
We assume that Russia will oblige the Syrian military Aviation stop the bombing of areas controlled by opposition forces. This should also apply to areas in which opposition forces operate alongside the Jebhat Fath Al-Sham forces (this is a “rebranding” of the Jebhat al-Nusra terrorist group, which is banned in Russia - note “VO”).

What “concessions” does Washington require from Russia in Syria?

One more factual demand of the USA attracts attention. The point is that Russia should influence the Syrian army in order to unblock the supply line of militants north of Aleppo. In the US, this path is called the “humanitarian corridor” through which humanitarian aid is delivered. At the same time, the American media do not cover exactly when the States carried out operations to deliver humanitarian aid to the residents of Aleppo, unless “humanitarian aid” includes containers with airplanes dropped from US aircraft. weapons and ammunition, oddly appearing in the militants.

In a letter to Mr. Ratni, it is stated that if Moscow fulfills these “conditions,” then the United States “will begin to coordinate its actions with the Russian Federation on countering Al-Qaida. Moreover, this is being exposed as a great blessing for Russia on the part of the United States ... Such statements that Russia "must fulfill the conditions" are more like blackmail than the proposal for partnership.
  • ru.krymr.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    5 September 2016 06: 26
    Russia owes nothing to anyone, and the United States directly showed with this blackmail that they want to get terrorists out of our attacks, and to provide them with their protection
    1. +33
      5 September 2016 06: 36
      Personally, it seems to me that all this talk about concessions is a dummy! Before the end of its activities, the Obama administration needs to keep a face at a bad game in order to somehow support the Democrats on the eve of the elections and create the impression among the layman that all foreign policy failures are connected exclusively with the "bad" behavior of Russia of sticking a spoke in the wheels of the "most exclusive" country in the world!
      1. +24
        5 September 2016 07: 36
        The day before, the US president announced that without some concessions on the part of Russia, “it will be difficult for Moscow to achieve peace in Syria”

        And what if he doesn’t give in? will you openly fight on the side of the barmalei? So we have no doubt that you are the main terrorists in the world.
        1. 0
          5 September 2016 07: 46
          Yes, agree, not the first time. That's just what?
          1. +5
            5 September 2016 08: 37
            It is becoming increasingly clear that it is the United States that is conducting a proxy war against the ATS in BV, in which even Israel is drawn. It’s like saying to the BV countries of the USA: “Fight for me!”

            At one time, U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower defined proxy warfare as a way of waging a proxy war, using third parties, and as the cheapest way to achieve national goals.

            The classic definition of proxy war was given by the American political scientist Karl Deutsch in 1964: “Proxy war is an international conflict between two countries that are trying to achieve their own goals through military operations taking place in the territory and using the resources of a third country, under the guise of allowing internal conflict in this third country. ”
            See - http://rusnod.ru/novosti/v-mire/politika/2015/12/
            15 / politika_14033.html
        2. WKS
          5 September 2016 11: 27
          The president of Russia should stop meeting this "lame" black man. His worn-out record won't give anything new. A political corpse.
          1. +2
            6 September 2016 04: 20
            And not only that ... Tired of humiliating ourselves in front of an exceptional nation ...
        3. 0
          5 September 2016 13: 55
          Return the suitcase, otherwise it will be like in Odessa - it was stolen and not returned!
      2. +3
        5 September 2016 07: 49
        Abame on the forum 20 except that the podzhopniks did not set, that the Americans are puffing at least something like success to portray!
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +3
          5 September 2016 11: 23
          [/ quote] Abame on the forum 20 except that the assholes didn’t put, here the Americans are puffing at least something similar to success to depict! [quote]
          laughing Well you say too! Yes, they just let him know that the deadline has already passed, and how he worked, that is, he is not worthy of the red carpet and the front door, the Chinese are simply beautiful !!!
    2. +4
      5 September 2016 06: 39
      [quote] We we assumethat Russia will oblige .............. [/ quote
      If the Americans suggest, means that Russia has, and that's great! Keep it up and keep up the pace!
      1. +6
        5 September 2016 07: 52
        I agree with Zyablitsov: before leaving, Obama continues to pretend to be a peacemaker. He shows that it was not for nothing that he was given the Nobel’s in advance !!!! I wonder if the Americans know this? ? Apparently not - they believe in their exclusivity.
        And as emphasized, not respectfully, he was treated in China !! Different ways!!!!!!
        1. 0
          5 September 2016 11: 28
          [/ quote] It shows that it was not in vain that the Nobel’s was given to him !!!! He wants to be remembered peacefully by his slogans. Terrible crimes have been committed under these slogans. I wonder if the Americans know this? [quote]
          They know, not everyone is sure, but for example, the site --- http: //www.veteranstoday.com/--- like ours, sometimes I look, interesting (well, for me at least).
  2. +25
    5 September 2016 06: 26
    "Do everything as I want, then maybe I'll stop shitting and pretend that we are at the same time."
  3. +6
    5 September 2016 06: 32
    "Such statements that Russia" must fulfill the conditions "are more like blackmail than an offer of partnership.

    It seems more like limitless arrogance.
  4. +5
    5 September 2016 06: 34
    Reuters claims that it became aware of specific “concessions from the Russian Federation”

    The main liars of the USA ...



























    Do not believe the word Anglo-Saxon media.

    Details: https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2174860.html Any use of materials is allowed only if there is a hyperlink to REGNUM IA.

    1. +1
      5 September 2016 11: 45
      laughing I clicked on your very first link and here’s what I saw there first lol ! Photo by Jonathan C. Wheeler (CC BY 2.0), Hidalgo, TX - In what some call "symbolic omen" and "sign from heaven" others, massive wall clouds form along the US / Mexico border as Republican nominee Donald J. Trump met with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto Wednesday afternoon in Mexico City.
      [/ quote] did not begin to read further laughing Well, a couple of comments from there
      September 1, 2016 at 4:48 pm
      What is strange is that weather radar and satellite observations do not show this cloud or the conditions that could lead to it. In addition, science cannot explain how a cloud wall could continue in a stationary position for several hours. Lamestream Media doesn't tell us everything! Wake up Sheeple!
      2 September 2016 to 10: 21
      Looks at me as God already hangs the spiritual wall. Thus, God cares about our country. just believe God that He loves you, and He cares about you. Continue to worship and praise Him. Including Him in your life. He will keep spiritual walled up.
      September 3, 2016 at 3:35 pm
      Amen and Amen. You are all so good. [Quote]
      That's so laughing but one pleases this trump side smile
  5. +5
    5 September 2016 06: 34
    "... You will get ears from a dead donkey, not Sharapov! .." (Gleb Zhiglov)
  6. +1
    5 September 2016 06: 37
    So let's see what Obama will Putin say. Sam asked for a conversation.
  7. +11
    5 September 2016 06: 42
    Their demand is reminiscent of the demand of classical terrorists who have taken hostages - provide a bus, plane, etc. This is essentially the case.
  8. +5
    5 September 2016 06: 46
    In the areas indicated by the Americans, it is necessary to double the number of air raids by the aerospace forces and Syrian government aviation.
  9. +1
    5 September 2016 06: 48
    What partnership is the US calling for?
    To what happened in February 2016?
    The international coalition bears all responsibility for the bombing of Syrian Aleppo on Wednesday. This is the response of the Ministry of Defense to allegations of the destruction of two Syrian hospitals, which the day before came from the Pentagon. On this day, there were no Russian planes in the sky above the city at all. Only American attack aircraft worked there. Statements by colleagues from the United States are called by the Russian military a calculated propaganda move.

    Is it about such a humanitarian mission that the United States is talking? And they want to call us to such a partnership!
    So, in my opinion, the United States blamed Russia without and without it. guilty of this raid.
  10. 0
    5 September 2016 06: 49
    Let first, as a gesture of goodwill, catch McLaren for trading in conscience (like Bout, for example) and hand it over to Russia laughing Canada, lacking even minimal sovereignty, will not be indignant. Or, which is absolutely safe and acceptable in general - Rodchenkova.

    But seriously - what kind of concessions to terrorists can there be?
  11. +2
    5 September 2016 06: 51
    This blackmail resembles the situation with Germany - to tear off a piece of Syria and make it a zone of occupation of Washington. Moreover, a fatty piece of oil.
  12. +2
    5 September 2016 06: 52
    No concessions, the destruction of the IG and their allies to the last. Washington wants the terrorists to multiply and trample on crowds in Russia. Enough to set up a training ground there. Russia must bring it to the end. The Americans destroyed everything there that is possible. Obama is obliged to speak on equal terms with Russia ... and it’s time to get used to it a long time ago.
  13. +3
    5 September 2016 06: 58
    There will be no sense from "partners" in the "fight" against terrorism. The United States does not care about the hornets' nest of terrorism close to Russia, moreover, and their so-called demands for concessions from Russia confirm this, they will happily accept the victory of ISIS over the Syrian government. I don’t think that this fact is not obvious to Putin, I don’t know what game he is playing with this bunch of “partners”, but so far their presence in Syria is very harmful to the victory over ISIS, the brainchild of the United States. It would be easier to initially push these "partners" out of Syrian airspace with the help of our S-400, using the permission of the legitimate Sirian authorities.
  14. +1
    5 September 2016 07: 03
    if Moscow fulfills these “conditions”, then the United States will “begin to coordinate its actions with Russia on countering Al Qaeda”

    We did without their help and coordination of actions (with the exception of aviation flights), we will manage further. They do not want to share the so-called. "opposition" is not necessary. So we need to continue bombing everyone who is fighting the Syrian army, regardless of the lamentations and lies of the State Department. The United States wants too much. And the bandits so as not to be touched and taken under the cap of the American military.
  15. +1
    5 September 2016 07: 05
    The complete surrender of all the militants and organizations fighting against Assad and no longer accept any offers! am
  16. 0
    5 September 2016 07: 20
    Washington dreamers, vigorous Washington .... fool
  17. aba
    5 September 2016 07: 24
    if Moscow fulfills these “conditions”

    The habit of commanding all must be reviewed by the Americans ... At least in relation to Russia.
    Although our insistent proposal to the Americans to coordinate actions in Syria is a bit surprising - it was necessary to declare the sky of Syria a no-fly zone from the very beginning, or at least from the moment we shot down Sushka, there would be more sense.
  18. +1
    5 September 2016 07: 43
    In my opinion, they only need one concession from us there - so that we get away from there. And faster. Washington dreamers.
  19. 0
    5 September 2016 07: 45
    "Peace on our terms"? No USA, you shouldn't behave like winners, again you can sit in a puddle
  20. 0
    5 September 2016 07: 46
    "Anything, even a devil in a mortar - bring it!" V.S. Vysotsky.
    That’s the way the mericatos are, they will invent ANY, the most sloppy reason, but only against Russia. Yes, they all went to the forest! angry
  21. +1
    5 September 2016 07: 47
    all these requirements are more like persuasions and pleas voiced by talking heads -
    bastards where did Psaki - miss wink
  22. 0
    5 September 2016 07: 57
    When there is no agreement in the comrades, Their deed will not go smoothly, And it will not come out of it, only flour
    I. Krylov

    And we with the USA have neither Partnership, nor, moreover, Consent!
    So, what will be this chaos for a long time, with mutual accusation!
    During the Second World War, they were able to find consensus. And now God himself commanded to unite.
    Unless, of course, the US statement on international terrorism is not a simple farce to declare its hegemony and desire to take the "throne" of the supreme judge of humanity.
  23. +1
    5 September 2016 08: 05
    I just want to say to such partners: "Yes, kill yourself against the wall!" They remind me of the behavior of capricious, spoiled children. They are told not to water the Gremlins, there will be trouble. But they so want, they are so "fluffy"!
    Well, let them be cannibals, they don’t eat us (yet)! And the rest - do not mind.
    They got it with their "moderate" ones. We said that for the moderate we have "moderate" fugasks, we can even paint them pink. Or is it better in blue?
  24. 0
    5 September 2016 08: 10
    Offers simply ignored, as well as increase the work of aviation and ramming with a vengeance.
  25. 0
    5 September 2016 08: 12
    It still has the audacity to demand! Do you want a black-footed cone with a tarpaulin boot over the stinking mouth? Well, the Yankees are completely overgrown! We will kick them all over the world cruelly and painfully.
  26. 0
    5 September 2016 08: 14
    The United States and its EU six demand only one thing, they have it as a "mantra" that they repeat everywhere and in any case - "Assad must leave" ... "Russia must leave" ...
  27. 0
    5 September 2016 08: 25
    Usual move of the USA, when something doesn’t work out for them ... they begin to demand .... what are the concessions? You guys obviously got something wrong ....
  28. +1
    5 September 2016 08: 28
    The states need a coalition with Moscow - this is how they legitimize their stay in Syria. Now the actions of the United States are the actions of a stronger BANDIT against a weaker enemy (Bashar al-Assad, Syria). We need a coalition with the states in order not to "kill" their advisers and not listen to their "shouts" about the "appazition". So who needs cooperation on Syria?
    If we hypothetically assume that tomorrow the US disappeared from Syria - within six months - the hostilities would be over. And finished not in favor of the "babayev".
    I think that the statements of the "exceptional" are most of all necessary for them to maintain their "image". We don't need them in Syria. And it "enrages" them.
    Thanks to the Supreme for such a turn!
    1. 0
      5 September 2016 09: 05
      We don't need them in Syria. And it "enrages" them.

      In general, for the last 30 years, Americans have been sovereign masters there
      And literally nearby - Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oil, Israel ...
      We appeared there, though triumphantly, but completely
      unexpectedly for the West. They want to rewind everything.
      Someone must leave. For America, this is the end of their empire.
      No, they won’t leave. From there it is simply impossible to leave.
      Therefore, they will probably sooner or later but they will squeeze us out of there
      Or should we ourselves become a world empire
      1. +1
        6 September 2016 05: 39
        In Syria, the Americans were not masters - there they are "not very fond of", they still listened to France - history, however ...
        In Syria, Russia did not appear - it has been there since the days of Assad the father, although with the help of the drunk "friend Bill" was able to significantly reduce, almost eliminate the Russian presence there (there remained a base in Tartus, "military teachers" in Aleppo and "military representatives"). This is about the military, but "business", as representatives of this direction once told me: "There is no oil - what to do with them!"
  29. 0
    5 September 2016 08: 40
    What nonsense? How long will our leadership tolerate such rudeness: either these "luminaries of democracy" accuse Russia of all "grave" things, then they brazenly demand concessions and actual betrayal of Syria, and HOO-HU is not HO-HO! And in general, where did they get the idea that we owe them something? But it seems like the time has come for us to ask them for all the meanness and tricks committed against Russia!
  30. 0
    5 September 2016 08: 45
    You show them on the map, or rather.
  31. +1
    5 September 2016 08: 58
    from the statement: "Russia must influence the Syrian army in order to unblock the supply route for the militants north of Aleppo."
    The conclusion is, why? And to ensure that the war lasts forever and depletes the stocks of both the Syrian army, and possibly the Russian one, that’s what Obama wants. It’s not sweet to see them and pepper was poured on their tail.
    It is necessary to create an atmosphere of truth, and only truth, that the IS is the feeding up of the USA. And when the earth begins to burn under the feet of the United States, only then it will be possible to restore order in Syria. Any negotiations with terrorist accomplices (read as patrons) -USA should not be. If this happens now, then all the information on some reason. From here the conclusion is that V.V. Putin knows more than us. And this is undeniable. So wait and see what and how.
    1. 0
      5 September 2016 09: 26
      my five cents
      [i] from the statement: "Russia must influence the Syrian army in order to unblock the supply route for the militants north of Aleppo."

      The conclusion suggests itself, for what?

      Of course, it is necessary to influence! ....... For the Syrian army to complete the military operation to liberate Aleppo as quickly as possible! And finally, it unlocked ...... Ways of supplying Aleppo with Humanitarian Aid!
  32. +2
    5 September 2016 08: 59
    The United States will not calm down in any way, their toad strangles on wasted money. They invested in the collapse of the SAR, so that later they would quietly throw a gas tube through the former Syria to Europe. Everything went well, even chem. Syria had weapons, an excellent reason to bomb Syria. But here Russia intervened with its assistance to Assad, who had already been written off, and everything went wrong with the Americans. The Russians were officially called, and the United States was not invited, but they manage to inflict air strikes there and their special forces run around somewhere. It looks like an invasion. That is why they are expecting some concessions from Russia in order to whitewash themselves, and at the same time continue actions to divide the ATS - the Qatari gas must somehow be pumped to Europe.
  33. +3
    5 September 2016 09: 05
    It’s very interesting for me to look at the American reaction after the air strike of the Russian Federation on Islamists in Iraq.
    At the same time, let’s notify them, say 10 minutes before the flight.
    What will be their arguments?
    A blow to the territory of a sovereign state without its permission - this is how we fight terrorism and are completely right!
    And if you’re wrong, can you look in the mirror?
  34. +3
    5 September 2016 09: 15
    Damn, when the Yellowstone volcano wakes up, these Americans are dumbfounded
  35. 0
    5 September 2016 10: 14
    The Americans stumbled over Russia in Syria and broke their nose, but they had no idea that with their "exceptional" obstinacy they would split their skulls !!!
  36. +1
    5 September 2016 10: 55
    Russia has not seen anything good from the United States in the last 70 years, so let Washington go on its camel ass
  37. 0
    5 September 2016 13: 34
    They already have to ask and not "demand" them, and so they are already being driven from the Middle East with might and main, in Turkey they were broken off, in Syria they are being driven even by the Saud servants they have already sent.
  38. 0
    5 September 2016 16: 48
    The day before, the US president announced that without some concessions on the part of Russia, “Moscow will find it difficult to achieve peace in Syria.”

    Well, how did the bibizyan turn everything upside down.

    From the letter of Ratni:
    We assume that Russia will oblige Syrian military aviation to stop bombing areas controlled by opposition forces. This should also apply to areas in which opposition forces operate alongside Dzhebhat fath ash-Sham forces (this is the “rebranding” of the Dzhebhat al-Nusra terrorist group, banned in Russia).

    Shchaz-zzz. Russian VKS are in Syria by invitation legitimate government, and act in the interests of the Syrian army. But shtatovskih warriors and other riffraff, are in Syria illegally.
  39. 0
    5 September 2016 20: 19
    Insolence amers knows no bounds
  40. 0
    5 September 2016 23: 09
    if Moscow fulfills these "conditions", then the United States "will begin to coordinate its actions with Russia to counter Al-Qaida.

    Why not the notes from the "cable car" ??? Who would believe in such nonsense, even if all this is taken on faith? But what cannot be taken away from pendopolosatyh is the ability to express themselves with weight! They will say, ass @ ntsy, any nonsense that is interesting only to them and their mongrels, but it sounds weighty ... In my opinion, it's not a sin for us to learn this ...
  41. 0
    6 September 2016 00: 55
    Let this United States sit quietly and do not climb anywhere and send its terrorists anywhere. And do not slander and do not lie about the Russians and Russia. Otherwise, the United States will be destroyed by Russia, the Russians. And the surviving part will be incorporated into Russia.
  42. +1
    6 September 2016 10: 21
    If a pro-American or other position does not want to enter into a political dialogue with Assad, then from the outside, what kind of thing do the Phaington macaques care about, who asked the smoked leader of the Macington macaques to send American troops so far from phashington?
    The historical mission of the Russian Federation and Syria to utilize thousands of cruel and cynical ghouls distraught with impunity, mercilessly killing civilians in Syria, and also threatening to establish their power all over the world.
    It is as if no one understands why the Americans created an Alkaida clone in this region. The goal is to wreak havoc. The task of ISIS is to cause a flow of refugees to the geyropu. Destroying stability in the geyropa and forcing the geyropeytsy to deploy this whole horde of unfortunate people and criminals to Russia. There were few banderkarins, the Russian Federation did not appear at war.
    In vain Columbus discovered America, it's time to close it. Are there really effective economic measures to destabilize the FSA economy?
  43. 0
    6 September 2016 13: 19
    Politely send over the ocean, explaining that no one invited them to Syria. We will deal with banduys.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"