The White House called Moscow’s “amoral” position on the findings of the investigative commission on the use of chemical weapons in Syria

56
Russia's response to the UN report on chemical use in Syria weapons is “immoral” because it is aimed at protecting “Assad who has lost legitimacy,” RIA News a statement by the White House press service.





The agency recalls that on Tuesday, the UN Security Council held the first discussion of the UN report and the OPCW on the use of toxic substances in Syria. According to experts, government forces are guilty of two attacks (out of nine) with the use of poisonous substances, one of which is the militants of the IG. Representatives of the United States, Britain and France said they would seek the imposition of sanctions against the Assad government. The Russian permanent representative noted that the commission’s conclusions raise questions, the evidence base is insufficient, and some of the data contained in the report could have been fabricated in general.

“These are the very actions (of the Syrian authorities) that led to the loss of legitimacy (of President Bashar) Al-Assad for ruling the country. He deepened the contradictions and chaos in Syria, which feeds extremism. It is immoral for the Russians to provide international cover for the Assad regime as they (the Syrian authorities) carry out such heinous actions ”,
quoted by the press service of the representative of the White House, Josh Ernest.
  • http://news-mail.by
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +61
    2 September 2016 09: 49
    It was immoral at the UN to flask a flask with white powder !!! Forgot???
    1. +17
      2 September 2016 09: 55
      Who would be talking about morality if it was an empty place for them? lol
    2. +5
      2 September 2016 10: 01
      taseka-then in the united states the american representative simply showed a test tube from which he was conceived in the light of white.
    3. +6
      2 September 2016 10: 35
      How they like loud phrases. Unprovenly destroying entire countries and getting away with it? Who sows the wind, reaps the storm!
      1. +1
        2 September 2016 11: 09
        The White House is clearly obsessed with chemical weapons, they say that its officials have gone so far as to find components of military warfare agents even in their wives' underwear. What can we say about the disagreeable White House regimes of certain countries. Just some kind of chemical paranoia!
        1. 0
          2 September 2016 11: 53
          ..Not only got mad and messed up the White House. They stopped thinking, and this is apart from their personal problems, that people are absolutely not interested, for the rest of the world it is dangerously unreadable, due to dementia, actions.
          The demented with the atomic bomb is not even a monkey with a grenade.
        2. 0
          3 September 2016 06: 50
          They simply don’t have enough of their own chemistry, and they’re looking for others to shred.
    4. +3
      2 September 2016 12: 50
      The existence of the White House is also immoral
  2. +6
    2 September 2016 09: 51
    Groundless accusations are the calling card of striped "democracy".
  3. +16
    2 September 2016 09: 53
    Chemical weapons, anthrax, is it really that the Americans have such a miserable fantasy? They can't come up with anything new. We would have looked, perhaps, "works" of Hollywood, there are still enough fresh ideas, a zombie virus, a gay bomb or cooperation with aliens. Although no, Russia is already cooperating with aliens.
  4. +8
    2 September 2016 09: 56
    Generally, the existence of SyShyA is synonymous with meanness.
  5. BAI
    +8
    2 September 2016 10: 01
    Of the 9 attacks - 2 Syria, 1 - IG. And the rest 6 who? After all, Powers’s test tube at the UN doesn’t speak about the morality and reliability of investigations.
    1. +1
      2 September 2016 10: 29
      Not so long ago on the network I met the indication / presence of 3 attacks. Therefore, it is interesting not only who, but when?
    2. +1
      2 September 2016 14: 38
      They are silent about the remaining 6 attacks, maybe because the CIA’s ears cannot be covered up there?
  6. +3
    2 September 2016 10: 01
    "The face of immorality" speaks of morality. Where there should be morality, these individuals have long been a fetid swamp.
  7. +25
    2 September 2016 10: 03
    I’m sorry. No one will remind you how many thousands of tons of chemistry the Americans threw into Vietnam and how many Vietnamese were killed?
    1. +5
      2 September 2016 10: 08
      Greetings, Alexander! So it was "democracy and freedom" flying on the wings of the "exceptional".
  8. +2
    2 September 2016 10: 04
    Sanctions against Assad? fool He returned the Dutch heights back, and forced Syrian passports on Jews by force?
  9. +14
    2 September 2016 10: 04
    Remind the US of their phosphorus bombardments of Fallujah? Can napalm flooded Vietnam? Or even the use of uranium artillery shells?
  10. +15
    2 September 2016 10: 07
    These are the very actions (of the Syrian authorities) that led to the loss of legitimacy (of President Bashar) Assad to govern the country. He deepened the contradictions and chaos in Syria that fuel extremism. It’s immoral for the Russians to provide international cover for the Assad regime as they (the Syrian authorities) carry out such disgusting actions ”

    And as it was more than once in foreign media that the components were supplied from England, and the explosives were handicraft and used by terrorists. And where did Assad get chemical weapons when the remnants of it were destroyed in the United States in January this year. http://mirror700.graniru.info/War/Arms/Chem/m.247
    525.html
    The White House is the organizer of the use of chemical weapons in Syria, since it wants to remove Assad at any cost, but the test tube with washing powder does not roll.
    1. 0
      2 September 2016 10: 20
      And where did Assad get chemical weapons when the remnants of it were destroyed in the United States in January this year.

      They left it for a test tube, I don’t believe the Americans that everything was destroyed because the periodic one was floating in Syria!
  11. +2
    2 September 2016 10: 09
    When the Washington Regional Committee becomes completely ill with arguments, they talk about morality.
  12. +2
    2 September 2016 10: 10
    Moral of the story:
    In the report, the hole was
  13. +5
    2 September 2016 10: 18
    And what is so possible? Directly stand up and announce to the whole UN, without any evidence? Well then: chemical weapons in Syria were used by the United States and its coalition allies. are on the territory of Syria illegally and are not controlled by anyone, kill civilians and support ISIS (banned in the Russian Federation). Thwart sanctions on the most "do not play" the United States and its allies in the coalition! laughing Something like americos do
  14. sl3
    +1
    2 September 2016 10: 20
    And what moralities this cesspool can stutter. We forgot how Colin Powell waved a test tube in 2003, and with foam at the mouth they proved the presence of chemical weapons in Iraq. As a result, it turns out to be a mistake. But what about the thousands of dead.
  15. +2
    2 September 2016 10: 22
    Hello garage! Assad has no chemistry, and indeed it would be so stupid to substitute. And if a crazy projectile, Barmaleev’s chemists forced him to brainwash and chemistry, so what does Assad have to do with it, they themselves cleaned all his chemistry
  16. +5
    2 September 2016 10: 23
    The UN is the rudiment of international politics. What it is that it is not the only thing. The USA with its mongrel satellites has long been wiped with all the resolutions of this organization.
  17. 0
    2 September 2016 10: 25
    Again, a flask of powders looms. In the hands of the defenders of US democracy.
  18. +3
    2 September 2016 10: 28
    It’s moral - to drop an atomic bomb on unarmed Japanese, spraying Vietnamese with chemicals, tearing Gaddafi to pieces, and everything that Russia does is immoral ...
    D ...... b .......
  19. +6
    2 September 2016 10: 32
    The position on the Paralympics is immoral - that's for sure.

    And as for fabrication - right, after Powell everything needs to be checked through a magnifying glass.
  20. +4
    2 September 2016 10: 34
    "According to experts, government forces are to blame for two attacks (out of nine) using toxic substances, and IS militants are guilty of one. Representatives of the United States, Britain and France said they would seek sanctions against the Assad government."

    And why are they not imposing sanctions against IS militants and against "unidentified forces", which the other SIX times used OV?
  21. +5
    2 September 2016 10: 34
    These are the very actions (of the Syrian authorities) that led to the loss of legitimacy (of President Bashar) Assad to govern the country.

    I understand that you can lose virginity (and even know how to do it). But lose legitimacy? request
  22. +6
    2 September 2016 10: 41
    To oppress Russian athletes with disabilities in general is the top of American morality. The rest has just been mentioned.
    1. +1
      2 September 2016 11: 03
      Altona
      To oppress Russian athletes with disabilities in general is the top of American morality

      This is a highly moral action, since 22 licenses of Russian athletes go to state athletes who need them deeply.
      1. +1
        2 September 2016 11: 12
        I forgot to say. This is the moral of a bandit, a criminal: but who cares?
  23. +6
    2 September 2016 11: 08
    Russia supports Assad - immorally. Europe and the United States support Poroshenko-the top of morality. The logic is where, the Bologna education system ate it ?!
  24. 0
    2 September 2016 11: 13
    US morality is measured in dollars.
    It is especially high moral to fine billions of European and Russian corporations.
    I can’t even take the upper level of US morality. 8- \.
  25. +1
    2 September 2016 11: 17
    P'ndo-s-tan, probably, simply did not destroy Assad's chemical weapons, but sent it back to Syria, only to his own militants. Applied, then the "examination" will prove that the chemistry is government
  26. +1
    2 September 2016 11: 35
    There, in general, conscience has long been sold at auction. It was immoral to lie to the whole world about the WMD of Iraq, to ​​bomb Yugoslavia only because they wanted to turn Libya into a cesspool of banditry because the country's leader was independent. These people generally do not have any moral rights, not to speak of morality, but simply hawala their own in the company of decent people.
  27. 0
    2 September 2016 11: 55
    What is the OPCW and are Russian experts included in it or is it like with WADA, they just drive bullshit and everyone must believe?
  28. +1
    2 September 2016 11: 58
    According to experts, government forces are guilty of two attacks (out of nine) using poisonous substances, and IG fighters are guilty of one.
    And who is guilty of the remaining seven? Are not the main demons of democracy for all the peoples of the world? This is just what is immoral!
  29. 0
    2 September 2016 12: 46
    The circus left - the clowns remained. We also need to wave the urine test tube, as the African-American once waved a test tube with washing powder. And it turns out that when the chemical weapons were exported from Syria, the reconnaissance exploded and did not track that Assad had clamped a couple of cylinders. laughing
  30. 0
    2 September 2016 12: 50
    I read it with fuss, breed or plagiarism. The easiest way is to rip from the Internet and without adding anything to dump.
    Always, when the question arises about the use of chem. weapons, the question should arise - is it not a defeat (accidental or deliberate) of a household object in the technology of which a dangerous chemical was used. substances? I remember a year and a half ago, near Donetsk, as a result of an art attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, people smelled chlorine or its compounds. Our media shouted about a chemical attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces (those who wish can google this phrase, no question). But panic among the population, can you imagine? It turned out that as a result of the shelling, the compressor unit at the water treatment plants was damaged. Agree, this is not the same thing as using a chemical. weapons? Yes, this is a big but solvable problem. In a confrontation, you need to be prepared for such moments.
    If a shell gets into a street closet (cesspool), or a not very old burial site opens in a cemetery - there will be a smell and panic ....!
  31. 0
    2 September 2016 12: 54
    What to pay attention to their statements? Clinton said the exclusivity of the American nation. If we forget that there is no such nationality (and there is only rabble from all over the world. Moreover, the scum), then we can understand that it is not worth paying special attention to their nonsense. Follow the statements of different just in case. But take offense and react sharply is not worth it. They do not take offense at patients (especially on their heads). True humpback is treated only with a stick, and only the grave will correct it.
  32. 0
    2 September 2016 14: 59
    I remember that the OPCW followed the mandate in which the type of substance used was established, and did not investigate who used the CW. So where, after a long time, do conclusions about the fault of the Syrian government come from? The reason is that the details are forgotten, but the fact that the IS raised the states is not proven?
    To begin with, it's time for Washington to hold accountable for the spread of terrorism in Syria.
  33. 0
    2 September 2016 15: 07
    Quote: OstWest
    ..Not only got mad and messed up the White House. They stopped thinking, and this is apart from their personal problems, that people are absolutely not interested, for the rest of the world it is dangerously unreadable, due to dementia, actions.
    The demented with the atomic bomb is not even a monkey with a grenade.

    That's it!!!!! And why do we need their conclusions sucked out from where. We need FACTS ... which as always are not.
  34. 0
    2 September 2016 15: 12
    Yes, here on the VO website among the selection, there is a note dated November 6, 2015 about the OPCW report - why should the government of Syria be involved - it is about the fault of IS and "other rebels".
    The US has no conscience, the link to the OPCW report is groundless, and they talk about morality?
  35. +1
    2 September 2016 17: 00
    They now call their morality lie!
    This is from the series:
    terrorist - "freedom fighter"
    pi ... s - gay.
    spitting - tolerance.
    intervention - "democratization of the country".
    armed coup - "color revolution" / sometimes "guiding" /.
  36. 0
    2 September 2016 18: 43
    "Janitor Antip is an immoral type." (Moreman).
  37. +1
    2 September 2016 19: 35
    Bal: "Out of 9 attack, 2 Syria, 1-IG, and the rest who?" Probably aliens?
  38. +2
    2 September 2016 21: 37
    And these scoundrels are trying to talk about morality?
  39. 0
    2 September 2016 22: 10
    Whose cow would moo about morality and immorality, but not Amerian. I would like to hear a sharp answer from our Foreign Ministry or Peskov to this rude guy.
  40. 0
    2 September 2016 22: 16
    The White House called Moscow's "immoral" position regarding the findings of the commission of inquiry on the use of chemical weapons in Syria.
    AMORAL AMORAL LEARN ABOUT MORAL ....
  41. 0
    3 September 2016 00: 47
    This US existence is immoral.
  42. 0
    3 September 2016 18: 19
    These actions of the above-mentioned states are immoral, especially the United States, since all the troubles that have fallen on the heads of the Syrian people are the work of their dirty hands.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"